Debiasing thinking among non-WEIRD reasoners
Résumé
Human reasoning has been shown to be biased in a variety of situations. While most studies have focused on samples of WEIRD participants (from Western Educated Industrialized Rich and Democratic societies), the sparse non-WEIRD data on the topic suggest an even stronger propensity for biased reasoning. This could be explained by a competence issue (people lack the ability to integrate logical knowledge into their reasoning) or a performance issue (people possess the logical knowledge but do not know it is relevant). We addressed this question using a debiasing paradigm with the base-rate task on a sample of non-industrialized people, the Himba of Namibia. After a short training, most participants were debiased, lending credence to the performance account. Debiasing was however to some extent boosted by schooling and living environment suggesting that competence also plays a role (in that more acquired knowledge allows for higher training benefit). Results imply that debias interventions can be successfully employed to boost sound reasoning around the world.
Domaines
Sciences cognitives
Fichier principal
Boissinetal_Debiasing thinking among non-WEIRD reasoners .pdf (880.76 Ko)
Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
licence : CC BY NC ND - Paternité - Pas d'utilisation commerciale - Pas de modification
licence : CC BY NC ND - Paternité - Pas d'utilisation commerciale - Pas de modification